Champion profile

Braum in draft

Played at Support in 100% of its games. A role under 30 games still opens, with counts only.

Presence (pick + ban)

21 %

picked or banned · 23rd of 173 championshalf of the champions are under 9.3%

Picked 12% · 335 of 2,708 gamesBanned 8% · 164 of 2,007 drafts with bans

Win rate at Support

Everything below reads on 335 games at Support. · 149 drafts without entered bans excluded from the ban denominator (2,007 games with bans) · Index built on Oct 27, 2026, 1:37 AM

In short

Four answers. Each card opens its chapter.

01 · In draftResponse ban: removed in phase 2, after the first picks.Banned, it makes room for

Nautilus

Leona

02 · In a compWhat sets it apart from other supportsFrontlineTeamfightLets allies carryCCFew duelsLittle damageNo poke

03 · With / againstGood against Nautilus.Good against

Nautilus67%52 gamesBad againstno clear pairBad duo withno clear pairGood duo with

Yunara64%36 games

04 · Build3 paths: Locket of the Iron Solari or Knight's Vow or Bandlepipes.

Guardian

Ban it or pick it?

Its place in the scene's drafts, and what happens when it is not there.

Where it is played

Share of Support picks taken by Braum, and its ban share, in each source

SoloQ

Master+ · ranked games of tracked players

3.0%12,353 picks out of 415,601banned in 7.5% of games · 5,592 of 74,465patches 16.21 → 16.19filtered by region

Tournaments

tournament code games

6.0%223 picks out of 3,686banned in 9.0% of games · 120 of 1,329patches 16.21 → 16.19filtered by region

Pro

all leagues · lolesports

1.2%26 picks out of 2,194lolesports does not provide banspatches 16.20 → 16.17region filter not applicable

Frequency only: share of the role's picks in each source, over ITS last 3 patches with games — the page's period does not apply · under 30 games in the role, not measured · the three sources are never added up · ban share over games whose bans are read only (soloQ: games collected since 10/17)

Presence by patch

Between 19% and 25% since 16.12 · 24.2% on 16.21 · 22.5% on 16.20

show the detail of the 10 patches

Patch	Presence	Games	Majority keystone
16.21	24.2%	2,671	Guardian93% · 364
16.20	22.5%	7,858	Guardian94% · 976
16.19	21.5%	6,733	Guardian92% · 785
16.18	21.1%	5,762	Guardian92% · 675
16.17	21.2%	5,728	Guardian91% · 624
16.16	21.6%	5,992	Guardian90% · 634
16.15	19.4%	5,530	Guardian93% · 524
16.14	19.7%	5,702	Guardian92% · 528
16.13	23.3%	7,391	Guardian93% · 830
16.12	25.1%	5,118	Guardian92% · 600

Presence = picks + bans over the patch's games, all regions · the axis follows the calendar: a patch without games leaves a void · hollow point under 30 games, nothing compared

When it gets banned

Response ban: removed in phase 2, after the first picks.

164 bans of 2,007 drafts with bans · the phase in strong ink grounds the reading line

Fearless

Fearless: taken at any point of the series.

G112.3%
G211.6%
G3+15.0%

Once burnt, the series moves to

Nautilus12

Milio9

Rakan9

series, of 92 where it is played in G1 then replaced at the same role

Share of each series game where it is picked · replacements: series where it is played in G1 then replaced at the same role (92), published from 30 series

If it is banned, they pick

What is played more often at Support when Braum is banned than when it is free, on both sides.

Read at Support, its main role: a ban has no role, it takes this one away first.

Nautilus
18.8% → 28.7%
Leona
11.0% → 20.1%
Rell
9.8% → 18.9%

show 1 other champion

Alistar
7.3% → 13.4%

164 games where it is banned · 1,598 where it is free and not picked · share of the role's picks: ○ free → ● banned · what the ban brings out, never why

When it is picked, the scene protects itself from

Comps with Braum ban these champions in phase 2 more often than other comps.

Rakan×1.53
Rell×1.31
Xerath×1.31

× = phase 2 bans in its comps relative to other comps, kept from ×1.25 · 44,638 tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12, the draft review window

What does it bring to a comp?

What its kit brings to its team, phase by phase, then in fights.

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other supports

Phase by phase

Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30

Damage / mintick = the supports

Lane · 5–14 min

Mid game · 15–22

Late · 23–30

Gold vs. direct opponent

Lane · 5–14 min

Mid game · 15–22

Late · 23–30

Not measured after 20 min: gold then follows the game's result.

Map pressuretakedowns outside its lane

Lane · 5–14 min4.5 takedowns outside its lane before 15 min · supports: 4.5

After 15 min

Measured before 15 min only.

Damage to champions per minute, at equal gold · gold against the direct opponent on a fixed ± 1,000 scale · map pressure before 15 min

In fights

itsupports
Damage absorbed per minute.
Share of its takedowns taken with several allies.
Share of its takedowns taken in a duel.
Damage from its four allies per kill when it takes part: a high rank means it lets its allies carry the damage, a low rank that it carries it itself.
Riot CC score per minute.
Share of its team's damage.

Bar centred on supports: to the right, more than them; to the left, less · fixed order, never sorted by value

What it is, what it is not

What marks itFrontlineTeamfightLets allies carryCC

What it is notFew duelsLittle damageNo poke

Split-push — Not applicable to this position.

Labels set by the server: the fact's criterion when it has one, otherwise the role rank (from 75 or at 25 and below)

Its tempo

level 6 at 8:36 (8:42), 1st item at 14:24 (14:24), 2nd at 25:12 (24:42), 3rd at 34:12 (32:12).

335 games · median minute of each milestone, supports in brackets

With whom, against whom?

The win rate is a range: only a range entirely on one side of 50% says something.

Allies and opponents

Its opponents, most frequent first.

Facing	Games	Reading
NautilusSUP	52	Favourablebetween 56% and 77%
WukongJGL	41	Evenbetween 36% and 61%
LeonaSUP	40	Leans against itbetween 31% and 55%
Jarvan IVJGL	36	Leans its waybetween 45% and 71%
SyndraMID	34	Evenbetween 39% and 66%
LuluSUP	33	Leans its waybetween 49% and 76%
TristanaADC	32	Favourablebetween 54% and 80%
JinxADC	30	Leans against itbetween 33% and 61%
Kai'SaADC	29	Too few for a rate (29 of 30)
ViktorMID	28	Too few for a rate (28 of 30)

show 94 other pairs

AhriMID	27	Too few for a rate (27 of 30)
SeraphineSUP	27	Too few for a rate (27 of 30)
AsheADC	22	Too few for a rate (22 of 30)
JhinADC	21	Too few for a rate (21 of 30)
YunaraADC	20	Too few for a rate (20 of 30)
K'SanteTOP	19	Too few for a rate (19 of 30)
OrnnTOP	19	Too few for a rate (19 of 30)
CaitlynADC	18	Too few for a rate (18 of 30)
RellSUP	18	Too few for a rate (18 of 30)
SionTOP	17	Too few for a rate (17 of 30)
Miss FortuneADC	17	Too few for a rate (17 of 30)
KarmaSUP	17	Too few for a rate (17 of 30)
RakanSUP	17	Too few for a rate (17 of 30)
SivirADC	16	Too few for a rate (16 of 30)
MilioSUP	16	Too few for a rate (16 of 30)
GnarTOP	15	Too few for a rate (15 of 30)
MordekaiserTOP	15	Too few for a rate (15 of 30)
PantheonJGL	14	Too few for a rate (14 of 30)
ShyvanaJGL	14	Too few for a rate (14 of 30)
ViJGL	14	Too few for a rate (14 of 30)
EzrealADC	14	Too few for a rate (14 of 30)
XayahADC	14	Too few for a rate (14 of 30)
AmbessaTOP	13	Too few for a rate (13 of 30)
AuroraMID	13	Too few for a rate (13 of 30)
OriannaMID	13	Too few for a rate (13 of 30)
CamilleTOP	12	Too few for a rate (12 of 30)
GarenTOP	12	Too few for a rate (12 of 30)
RenektonTOP	12	Too few for a rate (12 of 30)
ZeriADC	12	Too few for a rate (12 of 30)
ThreshSUP	12	Too few for a rate (12 of 30)
MalphiteTOP	11	Too few for a rate (11 of 30)
ShenTOP	11	Too few for a rate (11 of 30)
LockeMID	11	Too few for a rate (11 of 30)
CorkiADC	11	Too few for a rate (11 of 30)
LucianADC	11	Too few for a rate (11 of 30)
OlafTOP	10	Too few for a rate (10 of 30)
Lee SinJGL	10	Too few for a rate (10 of 30)
NocturneJGL	10	Too few for a rate (10 of 30)
CassiopeiaMID	10	Too few for a rate (10 of 30)
GalioMID	10	Too few for a rate (10 of 30)
YasuoMID	10	Too few for a rate (10 of 30)
YoneMID	10	Too few for a rate (10 of 30)
AlistarSUP	10	Too few for a rate (10 of 30)
RumbleTOP	9	Too few for a rate (9 of 30)
LilliaJGL	9	Too few for a rate (9 of 30)
SejuaniJGL	9	Too few for a rate (9 of 30)
ViegoJGL	9	Too few for a rate (9 of 30)
HweiMID	9	Too few for a rate (9 of 30)
LeBlancMID	9	Too few for a rate (9 of 30)
XerathMID	9	Too few for a rate (9 of 30)
BlitzcrankSUP	9	Too few for a rate (9 of 30)
NeekoSUP	9	Too few for a rate (9 of 30)
AatroxTOP	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
DariusTOP	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
SettTOP	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
ZaahenTOP	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
AmumuJGL	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
Cho'GathJGL	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
SylasJGL	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
TrundleJGL	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
Xin ZhaoJGL	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
ZaahenJGL	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
AkaliMID	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
SylasMID	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
VeigarMID	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
ApheliosADC	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
VarusADC	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
Dr. MundoTOP	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
GragasTOP	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
YorickTOP	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
ZacJGL	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
NamiSUP	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
Cho'GathTOP	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
JaxTOP	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
Cho'GathJGL	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
GravesJGL	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
GwenJGL	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
PoppyJGL	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
SkarnerJGL	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
AniviaMID	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
AzirMID	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
EkkoMID	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
LissandraMID	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
LuxMID	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
RyzeMID	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
MelADC	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
BardSUP	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
GwenTOP	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
SwainTOP	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
NaafiriJGL	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
AnnieMID	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
IreliaMID	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
DravenADC	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
ViktorADC	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)

Sorted by number of games · 104 pairs in this view.

Allies and opponents over 335 games, listed from 5 games per pair; under 30 games, only W/L counts are written.

How is it built?

Keystone, spells, first skill maxed and item paths, on the fallback level that has enough games.

The usual build

Read on patch 16.21, all regions. Patch + region does not reach 30 games (26).

Patch + region16.21 · 26 games, below the floor of 30
Patch16.21 · 391 games
2 patches1,433 games
Window335 games

Keystone + secondary tree

Guardian+

Inspiration

93% · 364 games

Summoner spells

Flash + Heal

80% · 312 games

First maxed skill

87% · 325 games

show 4 other choices of runes, spells or skill maxed

Other runes

orUnsealed Spellbook+Resolve3% · 12 games
orGuardian+Precision7% · 29 games

Other spells

orExhaust + Flash14% · 55 games
orFlash + Ignite6% · 24 games

391 games at the level read · a level is read from 30 games

Item paths

3 item paths, from the most played 1st item to the least.

Locket of the Iron Solari72% · 14:24
Knight's Vow65% · 25:36
Bandlepipes58% · 31:30
Knight's Vow13% · 14:00
Locket of the Iron Solari63% · 24:30
Bandlepipes11% · 14:00
Knight's Vow48% · 25:36

Each % reads along the path: at the 1st item, over the games that completed a 1st item; then, over those that made the previous steps AND completed one more item. A path stops under 10 games · median minute the item is completed, from 3 games.

show how we count

Draft, with / against and build: the filters at the top of the page (window, regions, level). What follows the meta moves fast.
In a comp and “the scene protects itself from”: 180 days of tournaments (from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12), the draft review window. A champion's kit changes little, it needs volume.
All games come from Master+ amateur tournaments. No soloQ.
A win rate is written from 30 games, always with its range. Under that threshold, wins and losses are written.
What the data does not say: the pick order (missing from the Riot API), engage (no reliable measure).